
Aiful, Acom, Promise, Lake. Many of those living or visiting Japan have seen these firms’ colorful billboards plastered on buildings across the country. They are all so-called sarakin firms – consumer lending companies that provide high-interest-rate loans to people and small businesses. The industry has long been surrounded by controversy: accused of driving poor lenders into crushing debt, the Japanese government reined in the industry in the 2000s. Now, the sarakin lenders are probably better known for their ubiquitous, high-production-value adverts.
The modern consumer finance industry’s roots go back to Japan’s high-growth era, when improving living standards gave rise to a new kind of consumer lending. This is also where the industry got its colloquial name sarakin: an abbreviation of “salaryman” for a salaried employee and “kinyuu” for finance, as the industry aimed its lending at Japan’s growing ranks of salaried, middle-class employees. Facing a pinch, or need to buy a hot new household appliance? All you needed was an ID and a self-declaration of income, and a loan of up to 300,000 yen (around 2,000 USD in October 2024 rates) could be yours in no time.
But this kind of borrowing always comes with risks. If you cannot pay the loan back quickly enough, the high interest rates can blow up the debt to astronomical proportions, while the lenders will try to find any way to claw back their loan. Already by the 1970s, the press wrote about desperate borrowers committing suicide in the face of aggressive debt collectors, shoplifting or seeking to profit from home insurance by setting fire to their house to make money for repayments. In response to growing public outcry over an increasing number of troubled borrowers, reforms in the 1980s gradually lowered the legal interest rate lenders could charge from the eye-watering 109.5% to 40%.
The industry soars and comes crashing down
This did little to dampen the industry’s growth. To it, Japan’s post-1991 Lost Decades turned out to be a boon: As growth and wages were stagnant, more people and small businesses turned to sarakin lenders (and sometimes to more unsavory, underground lenders) for money. New innovation, such as 24-hour automated loan booths, allowed borrowers to get a loan in 30 minutes, while a rule change allowed the industry to begin advertising on TV. Between the early 1990s and 2000s, the volume of outstanding consumer loans skyrocketed from 3.8 trillion yen in 1990 to 12 trillion in 2003. And so did personal bankruptcies, which went from 11,273 a year in 1990 to 184,422 by 2005.
In 2003, an Osaka man, his wife and brother committed suicide by jumping in front of a speeding train. In their suicide note, they wrote that their desperate act was in response to daily calls from underground loan sharks, who threatened to seek repayment from their neighbors if they would not pay up. Stories like this were ubiquitous, and they functioned as a spark to another rising tide of public outrage. This was aimed both at illegal underground lenders and their legal, consumer finance cousins – and at the government for its perceived failure to rein in the industry.
A 2022 study found that the most commonly cited reason for taking out a loan is either a low or loss of income.
In response, and despite intense lobbying by the industry, the Japanese government finally cracked down on the lenders in 2006. A new law set the maximum interest rate of loans at 20% and capped the amount of money a borrower could loan. The law also explicitly banned an industry practice where, to ensure payout, borrowers could take out life insurance with its proceedings going to the lender, allowing them to profit if a borrower died or committed suicide. In a second of two punches, Japan’s Supreme Court ordered lenders to pay back excess interest rates charged from borrowers, leading to a flood of applications demanding repayment.
As a result, the industry experienced a major downturn, with one of the major lenders, Takefuji, going bankrupt. In the 2010s, the industry saw much slower growth, both in terms of loan volume and number of lenders: By 2024, a little over 10 million people in Japan have an outstanding consumer finance loan, a number that has remained mostly steady over the past decade. As for why people borrow, the top reason is not to buy a hot new appliance: a 2022 study found that the most commonly cited reason for taking out a loan is either a low or loss of income. This was followed by needing a loan to purchase goods or services, and – in third place – needing a loan to repay another loan.
Ubiquitous advertising – but not without limits
But even if business is more sluggish than it used to be, the industry is a constant presence in Japan, through ubiquitous billboards, often placed near busy train stations, and high-production value TV commercials. Sarakin lenders’ advertising budgets are far smaller than consumer product firms such as Nissan and Suntory: a 2022 ranking of the top 300 Japanese firms by their ad spend, the first consumer lender is at 77 (Acom), with its total spend less than 10% of top advertisers such as Nissan, Aeon and Suntory.
This is partly because the lenders are, of course, smaller than giants like Suntory, but also because of industry-specific restrictions on advertising consumer loans. Sarakin lenders cannot exaggerate the ease of getting a loan, nor are they allowed to run TV ads during hours when children or young people might be watching (say, between 5 PM and 9 PM). But this still leaves time to run ads during popular late-night TV variety shows, like Wednesday Downtown, where ad breaks usually include at least one consumer finance ad. These adverts are produced by top advertising firms, star A-list celebrities, and include catchy jingles and memorable slogans. For many, the firms are probably better known for their advertisements than for money lending.
In the world of sarakin commercials, the connection between the ad and product is left murky.
In the world of sarakin commercials, the connection between the ad and product is left murky. This is partly due to the restrictions, and partly because many view the industry with some distaste owing to its dark side that is, naturally, not at all visible in the adverts. It is therefore safer to stick to being memorable than show a struggling family turning to sarakin firms for short-term relief. A good example is an ad by Lake (or Reiku) featuring popular comedy/TV host duo Chidori touring Seoul, advertising, perhaps, the possibility of taking out a loan to travel abroad. But the connection is left implicit and is overshadowed by the ad’s comedy.
But this is not always the case. As a step away from this industry standard, Acom’s September 2024 ad shows a man – a part-time worker who plays in a band – taking out an Acom loan (not explicitly shown but heavily implied) to buy a suit for his sister’s wedding. The story is clear: a man working a low-wage part-time job can attend an important family event thanks to Acom.
Based on the response to the ad, this more honest approach might not suit the industry. A popular message on X stated how “wrong” it was for Acom to turn someone’s poverty into an emotional story of family love, with many agreeing in the replies. Analysis in a Livedoor news article noted that precisely because sarakin ads have traditionally not talked about the actual loans, the criticism aimed at Acom’s ad, as evidenced by the video’s YouTube comments, too, was so strong. Most people would rather not want to be reminded of the truth behind the funny and memorable ads. The ad is meant to be the first in a series, but time will tell whether Acom will stick to this style – or revert back to the comedic style that has become industry standard.
Additional sources
Andrew M. Pardieck: “Japan and the Moneylenders—Activist Courts and Substantive Justice” Washington International Law Journal, 2008
Adrienne Sala: “The Japanese consumer finance market and its institutional changes since the 1980s” Japan Forum 2017
Damon Gibbons: “Taking on the Money Lenders: Lessons from Japan” Centre for Responsible Credit 2012









